Archive for January, 2007

Money Values and how they can Sabotage Us

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

MansionSome of my clients have come to me because they know they are not saving enough for the future but don’t seem to be able to change their behavior. These are smart, competent, well educated people who certainly understand their situation on an intellectually level, so why haven’t they been able to change their spending patterns.

The answer is they have deep seated money values that they may not be fully conscious of that are preventing them form changing. Until they acknowledge these values, and understand them it will be difficult for them to change.

What is a money value?
A money value is an association or meaning that money acquires which usually develops during childhood. For example, for many people who were children during the great depression when money was short, money may mean security. Money could also be the means to purchase status through a certain lifestyle (house, car, travel, boat, etc.). This is the money value that is subtly pushed in advertising. “You will have fantastic life if you purchase our product because it will make/give you, (higher status, a better parent, thinner, healthier, sexier, admired, envied, etc. etc.)”

How do money values affect us?
They motivate us at a very deep level and may engender feelings that we feel ashamed of if brought into the open. Example: a person buys a car she can’t afford to impress her neighbors (AND HERSELF!) that she is a successful happy person. In our society there is a particularly strong association between spending, perceived wealth, and high status. (I own a Mercedes therefore I am wealthy, I am wealthy and therefore I am high status). We adopt this value unknowingly and let it guide our spending decisions even if we would have made different decisions our status wasn’t at stake (e.g invest the money and drive an old car). The internalization of these values can often lead us astray holding on to a lifestyle we can’t afford and may not have ever really wanted.

How can we make decisions that really support what we want in life despite our money values?
The first step is to acknowledge them! You cannot change what you do not acknowledge. Once they are out in the open you have to ability to change them, keeping what you like and changing what doesn’t work for you. The next step is to decide what you really want out of life and write it down. I’m surprised that most people don’t do this. Once you have done that you can start prioritizing your big goals and quantifying them in terms of time commitment and financial resources required. Now you can evaluate your spending to see if it is really supporting the most important things you want out of life; to the extent that it is not, you have now given yourself the motivation to change your spending priorities.

How do we keep our goals front and center once the initial excitement wears off?
It is important to share your goals with those close to you and enroll them in supporting you.

Example: You start to bring your lunch to work everyday and your best friend at work starts to give you a hard time about it. Tell him that the reason you are bringing your lunch to work is that you are saving money to ( share your big goal and why it’s important to you), and that you hope that he can support you in achieving it.

Initially this will be disruptive to your relationships especially if it is a major change in your spending. It’s important to hold firm, and it may require you to reduce or eliminate contact with people that do not support your new direction. They may try to sabotage your change because it could be very threatening to them. However, this gives you the opportunity to spend more time with people who are supportive or seek out people who will support you in archiving what’s important to you.

I know this didn’t sound a lot like typically financial planning stuff but this is really at the heart of what I do. I see my role as helping clients identify what’s important to them, and making the unconscious decisions they are make conscious.

Why Index Funds

Wednesday, January 24th, 2007

Earlier this week I was a guest on The Money Show with Bill Moller on a local radio station. The topic was mutual funds and the differences between actively managed, index funds and exchange traded funds.

As my clients know I am a big advocate of index funds and exchange traded funds. Here are the key advantages of an index fund or an exchange traded fund. In a future blog I will discuss which types of index and exchange traded funds I favor.

Low Fees: Most index funds charge management fees of less than 0.5% per year. Actively managed funds often charge fees of about 1.5% year. Over time that difference really affects performance.

Tax Efficiency: Since index funds do not actively change the stocks that they hold they generate much lower capital gains distributions than most actively managed funds. That means that more of the capital gain on an index fund will be deferred and working for you rather than in the pocket of the US Treasury.

No Style Creep: Because of the nature of an index, Index funds cannot change the types of stocks they invest in. For example, an S&P 500 index fund will always invest in Large Cap US based companies. However, actively managed funds sometimes shift their composition (a large cap fund buying small cap stocks) to attempt to improve their performance. This practice makes it difficult for investors to know what type of fund they own.

According to research by Standard and Poors published in the Chicago Tribune, over the last 5 years the S&P 500 Index outperformed 71.4% of actively managed large cap funds, the S&P MidCap Index 400 outperformed 79.7% of mid-cap funds, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index outperformed 77.5% of small cap funds.

Next:  Money Values

What is a Roth 401k? Should You Contribute to one if you can?

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

A client recently contacted me because is employer was offering a new retirement plan called a Roth 401k plan.  Below is my best recollection of the conversation:

Client: What the heck is a Roth 401k Plan?

Me: It combines what’s good about a Roth IRA and a 401(k) plan together.

Client: Can you help me out a little more here?  I’m not totally sure what that means.

Me:  OK,  remember with a Roth IRA you don’t get a tax deduction but your money grows tax free, meaning that you don’t pay any tax on it even when you take it out.

Client: Yup, got it.

Me: Well a Roth 401k works the same way, you contributions grow tax-free and there’s no tax when you take the money out. In addition, you are not required withdraw the money as you are with a regular 401k, or Traditional IRA.

Client: But don’t I lose because I no longer get the tax deduction?

Me: You would only lose if tax rates are dramatically lower when you withdraw the money than they are now.  I consider that possibility to be highly unlikely.  With the projected costs of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid taxes are likely to be higher in the future than they are now unless we are willing to significantly cut benefit levels. Plus because you are not required to take withdrawals from a Roth 401k plan you have both taxable and tax-free income streams in retirement which gives you some ability to manage your tax bill.

Client: Ok, I get the part about the best of the Roth IRA, where does the best of the 401k come in?

Me: Well, with a Roth IRA you can only contribute up to $4,000/year ($5,000 if you are 50 or older), and you can’t contribute at all if you adjusted gross income (AGI) is over $160,000/year (for married filing jointly).  With a Roth 401k you can contribute up to $15,500 in 2007 ($20,500 if you are 50 or older) and there is no income restriction.

Client: Sounds pretty good, I was planning to contribute to it anyway but I wanted to check it out with you first just to make sure there was something bad about it that I didn’t know about.  By the way, when I leave my current employer can I roll my Roth 401k into a Roth IRA?

Me: You got it!  Just as you can roll a regular 401k into a Traditional IRA, you can roll a Roth 401k into a Roth IRA.

Client: Cool.

Shopping for Home and Auto Insurance made Eas(ier)

Tuesday, January 9th, 2007

Many of my clients are in the process of reviewing their Home and Auto insurance.  Some are also shopping for excess liability (umbrella) insurance coverage. Many companies offer discounts for having both home and auto coverage with them. Some will write umbrella policies only if you have home and auto with them.  The amount of underlying liability insurance they require before writing an umbrella policy also varies.  VERY CONFUSING! To help clients with sorting this out I developed the following script to help them get comparable price quotes when shopping for insurance:

Insurance Purchase Script

Here is a process that you can use to get comparable insurance quotes for your homeowners, umbrella
and auto insurance coverage. If
you can find a recent article rating auto insurance companies from Consumer Reports online please
read it to find companies that are highly rated.

1. Determine what level of umbrella liability coverage you wish to have (e.g. $2MM)

2. Determine what deductible you want for your homeowners insurance. Remember it’s
generally not a good idea to make small claims on your homeowner’s policy so you may wish
to have a higher deductible. Also decide if you want any riders on your policy (jewelry, furs,
firearms, art etc.)

3. Determine what deductible you want for collision and comprehensive on your auto policies, a
higher deductible will save a substantial amount on your collision and comprehensive
coverage. (decide if you want rental car coverage or any other extras)

4. Contact the insurance company or agent and ask the following questions:

a. I’m interested in getting a quote for an excess liability policy, and auto policy, and a
homeowners policy

b. I would like to get a $xMM excess liability policy. Assume that I will have all of my
coverage with your company. Could you provide me a quote for that?

c. I would like to get a quote for my homeowners (with replacement cost coverage) and
auto policies for the lowest amount of coverage that I would need to obtain the excess
liability policy that you quoted me. With a $x deductible on my homeowners policy
and a $y deductible on my auto policy. Can you provide me those quotes? ( Make
sure that the auto policy includes coverage for uninsured or underinsured motorists)

d. So I have $A for the excess liability policy, $B for the homeowners , and $C for the
auto policy. Is this correct?

e. What is the maximum amount the auto policy will pay if I am injured by uninsured or
underinsured motorist? Will it pay to the limit in my auto policy or to the limit of my
excess liability policy?

f. For your replacement cost coverage on the homeowners policy what is the maximum
the policy will pay in case my home is a total loss? (They will express this as a
percentage of the insured amount. If you house were insured for $100,000 and they
provided a maximum of 120% then the maximum would be $120,000)

Please Read if you have Young Children in Car Seats

Friday, January 5th, 2007

I’m sure many you have seen the newsreports about the failure of many child safety seats to protect children in simulated crashes. Consumer Reports Magazine recently tested 12 child seats. Of the tested seats 10 failed! Here is a link to results.

Yes, yes I know this post is not investment related, but I believe in a holistic approach to financial planning that goes beyond just investment advice.

Quarterly Stock Picking Contests — The Insanity Continues

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

My local paper, the Chicago Tribune holds a quarterly stock picking contest where they have four prominently local money managers pick three stocks to recommend and three to avoid during the next quarter.  They also report on the prior quarter’s pick.  This continues the one of the most useless waste of newsprint I have seen.  This contest continues to focus on short-term performance and speculation vs. long-term results.  I’m sure the managers they select do not focus on short-term performance in the mutual funds they manage, at least I hope not.

Now for the most recent results from the last quarter of 2006:

Of the 12 recommended stocks 10 went up.  The median increase was 5.4%.  Of the 12 stocks to avoid 10 went up.  The median increase of the stocks to avoid was 14.4%! This is not the first time the median for the avoid stocks was better than the median performance for the recommended stocks.

In summary:

  • Very smart people
  • Short term stock picking a losers game

I’ll keep track of this periodically and keep you posted on how the expert stock pickers are doing.