I’m sure you have seen those mutual funds ads where they brag about their performance. Well I have a new fund that blows most of them away! It’s called Bet on Red — 100% return last year — really! Watch the video for the whole story . . .
Archive for the ‘401k and 403b Plans’ Category
Bet On Red!
Thursday, February 25th, 2010When Index Funds Perform the Best
Monday, November 2nd, 2009I read an interesting article in today’s Wall Street Journal about when index funds do the best vs. actively managed funds. Index funds do the best in the asset classes that are seeing the strongest returns. The study was based on a 10-year period from 1997-2007. The reason for this is active managers tend to deviate from their primary asset class (e.g. Large-Cap manager buying Mid and Small Cap stocks) when the primary asset class has performed poorly and then miss the quick run up when the primary asset class recovers.
Does this mean that you should use active managers for poorly performing asset classes? No. The problem with this conclusion is not that actively managers are picking better stocks in their primary asset class but they are moving outside their designated asset class to try and improve performance. When they do this they change your overall asset allocation and risk/return profile without telling you. If you wanted to you could do the same thing with index funds but at least you would be aware of the changes you were making.
The article also did not address if they active managers’ performance was after all fees and expenses. Actively managed funds have management fees that average 6x higher a low cost index funds. In addition if you buy an actively managed fund through a broker you load fees in addition. There is also the issue of taxes. An actively managed fund turns its stock portofilio over about 3x/year which could generate signficiant short-term capital gains on which the mutual funds shareholders are taxed on lowering their overall retrun. An index fund may only turn over 20% or less of its portfolio generating much lower taxable gains.
My advice: Stick with low-cost index funds, for superior long-term performance.
Index Funds Make Even More Sense in a Downturn
Monday, August 3rd, 2009According to the Wall Street Journal many large institutional investors are turning too index funds after finding that actively managed mutual funds have not performed well during the downturn.
They would rather have the guaranteed lower cost of an index fund vs. the unfulfilled promise of better performance through an actively managed fund.
This is the strategy that I use with my clients. Although some actively managed funds will out perform an index fund the percentage that do is actually less than chance would predict. It is also difficult to predict which managers will outperform and index fund year after year. This is especially true for bond funds. According to Morningstar the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund has outperformed 83% of its peers over the last 10-years.
Index funds charge substantially less than their actively managed peers. A low cost index fund costs about 1% per year less than its actively managed peer. That means that the actively managed fund would have to outperform the index fund by 1% per year just to be equal. That is very difficult to do for almost all managers.
NAPFA Launches Financial Education Bus Tour
Monday, June 2nd, 2008As part of its consumer education mission NAPFA through the NAPFA Consumer Education Foundation is launching a nationwide financial education cities through the use of a bus outfitted with all the latest interactive learning tools. NAPFA members in each city will hold consumer education events in each city to coincide with the bus tour.
Check the http://www.napfafoundation.org/ website for updates on when the bus will be coming to you.
Why you may not get a Rebate Check
Thursday, May 1st, 2008With the first rebate checks arriving this week, I want to let some of my clients know that they will not be getting a rebate.
For joint filers the rebate begins to get phased out when you Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is greater than $150,000. After that you lose $50 for every $1,000 your income is over the threshold. For example, if you AGI is $160,000 you rebate is reduced by $500.
For those filing as single the threshold for a reduced rebate begins at $75,000. Your $600 rebate would be reduced to $0 once your AGI reaches $87,000.
For those of you getting a rebate below are 5 great things to do with it:
- Increase your contribution to your employer’s 401k/403b to get the full match. For an employer that matches $.50 for every $1 you contribute your $600 rebate is instantly worth $900.
- Contribute to a Roth IRA. With a Roth IRA your earnings grow tax free. In 25 years that $600 could be worth $4800 with no tax due when you withdraw it!
- Pay off high interest credit card debt. If you are paying 24% interest on a credit card paying it off is like getting a 24% return on your investment. Paying $600 would save you $144/year in interest payments
- Start an emergency fund. This is the money you use when the car breaks down etc. instead of running up a credit card debt. Open a high yield internet savings account at www.ingdirect.com, www.emigrantdirect.com or check www.bankrate.com for the latest savings rates.
- Open a 529 account for college savings. The Bright Start Illinois Plan was ranked as one of the best in the nation by the Wall Street Journal. Plus Illinois residents get a state tax deduction for any money they contribute. See www.brightstartsavings.com
More Attention Focused on 401k Fees
Friday, February 8th, 2008The Marketplace radio show on National Public Radio recently ran a two part segment on 401k fees. They focused on how small employers and their employees don’t understand these fees and how much they can reduce retirement savings.
Of course, the banks,brokers, and insurance companies think the present system is pretty good. After all, if people don’t know what they are paying they are willing to pay a lot!
If you are responsible for your small organization’s 401k plan and want to find out how to get a low cost plan with full fee disclosure that’s easy to understand, check out my website for employer plans at http://www.longfinancialplanning.com/for-business-and-non-profits
BIG Changes for 403(b) Retirement Plans
Friday, December 7th, 2007If you are contributing or sponsor a 403(b) there are some changes coming that you should know about. Beginning in 2009 403(b) plans will have to look much more like 401(k) plans behind the scenes. This means:
- 403(b) plans will have a fiduciary responsibility to their participants like 401(k) plans.
- They will have to have a Plan Document and Investment Policy Statement like 401(k) plans.
How does that affect you?
If you are a plan sponsor you will be required to:
- Ensure that your plan’s costs are reasonable (some high cost annuity plans have expenses in excess of 2% per year that is really high!)
- Have a written Investment Policy Statement that outlines how the investment choices in the plan are made and how you ensure your costs are reasonable.
- Take fiduciary responsibility for the plan. That means that you are on the hook! One way you can show you are taking fiduciary responsibility is to contract with a Registered Investment Advisor to advise you on the plan’s investment choices, and provide education to your employees. If you choose to work with an adviser make sure that your advisor is independent does not receive compensation from any investments that he or she recommends. You can find one at www.napfa.org
If you are a plan participant:
- You will be able to hold your employers accountable if you have a bad plan. I define a bad plan is one with ongoing asset based expenses in excess of 1.5% per year. A really bad plan would be one with ongoing asset based expenses in excess of 2% per year. These expenses include mutual fund expenses, wrap fees, annuity fees, commissions and any other fees that are based on the assets in the plan. If enough people complain your employer may change the investment choices and fee structure of your plan to lower cost options.
- You will be able to complain to the Department of Labor if you feel that your employer is not meeting it’[s fiduciary duty to keep plan costs reasonable.
- You will still have the right to choose a mutual fund company outside of the choices provided by your employer but that mutual fund company will have to be approved by your employer.
What can you do now?
- If you are a sponsor read the IRS model plan language at http://www.403bwise.com/pdf/model_plan_irs.pdf
- Find out the cost of your current plan. You can request a list of Questions to Ask about 403(b) Plan Costs by contacting me through the Contact page of the Long & Associates LLC website.
- Start planning for the changes now. You may want to engage the services of an advisor and record keeper who works with 403(b) plans to review your current investment options, and begin drafting a new plan document and Investment Policy Statement.
- Keep up on the changes as the regulations are written at www.403bwise.com
Why some of you may not want to Rollover your 401k into an IRA
Thursday, April 5th, 2007For years, I have told my clients regardless of income to rollover their 401k plan into an IRA when they change jobs.
Main Advantages to Rolling Over Your 401k Plan to an IRA:
- Consolidates all of your retirement assets in one place (especially if you have several jobs all with 401k plans)
- You control your investments especially important if your old employer had poor investment choices in their plan
Now for some higher income earners you may be better off keeping the money in your old plan or rolling directly to your new employers plan.
Here’s why:
- Beginning in 2010 the $100,000 income limit to convert a Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA is lifted.
- But if you do convert your Traditional IRA to a Roth all of your Traditional IRAs are treated as one IRA for the purposes of conversion. If you have a large Rollover IRA with no basis, and a smaller Traditional IRA that no made non-deductible contributions to they will be treated as one IRA and you will have to pay tax on most of the conversion.
- If you don’t rollover your 401k to a IRA the only Traditional IRA you would have is the one you made non-deductible contributions to. When you convert to a Roth IRA you would only pay taxes on the earnings of your Traditional IRA.
Example 1:
Jane has a 401k worth $200,000 and a Traditional IRA that she made non-deductible contributions to of $20,000. She rolls the 401k into a Traditional IRA so now she has:
Rollover IRA $200,000 (Basis = 0) All of her 401k contributions were tax deductible
Traditional IRA $20,000 (Basis = $18,000) Non-deductible contributions =$18,000, earnings = $2,000
She decides to convert $20,000 to a Roth IRA in 2010.
Since all of her IRAs are added together for the purpose of conversions $18,000 of the conversion will come from her Rollover IRA and $2,000 will come from her Traditional IRA.
Assume Jane is in the 25% tax bracket.
Taxes = $18,000 X 25% (Rollover IRA) + $2,000 X 10% (portion of Traditional IRA that is taxable) X 25% = $4,500+50 or $4,550
Example 2:
Jane does not rollover her 401k into a Rollover IRA but either leaves it in her old employer plan or rolls it into her new employer plan. Therefore she only has her Traditional IRA
She decides to convert her $20,000 Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA
Taxes = $20,000 X 10% (Portion of Traditional IRA that is taxable) X 25% =
$500
By not rolling over her 401k into an IRA Jane would save over $4,000 in taxes.
Small Employers — How Can You Find a Great Low Cost 401k or 403b Plan
Monday, March 26th, 2007In my last blog I discussed how a high cost retirement plan can cost employees a significant amount of their retirement savings. So what if you are responsible for the retirement plan at your organization — What questions do you need to ask to find a low cost plan that won’t saddle your employees with hidden fees?
1. What is the total cost of this plan including administrative fees, advisor fees (also known as ‘wrap-fee’ or asset management fee), and mutual fund fees?
Most employers look at administrative fees only. In the long-term the asset based advisor and mutual fund fees will comprise the vast majority of the costs. Most of these fees are hidden in that they are taken from the investment returns — most employees never know they are paying them. In general the fewer and lower the asset based fees in the plan the lower the overall cost to employees in the long-run.
2. Are there a wide variety of asset classes represented in the investment options?
Often employers get confused between the number of funds and the number of asset classes. A plan could have 20 different investment options from a variety of mutual fund companies but if all invest in large domestic companies the plan does not have diversification among asset classes.
Some key asset classes a plan should include are: Large Company Domestic Stock, Mid/Small Company Domestic Stock, International Stock, Bonds, Cash, and Real Estate. It is not necessary to include a large number of funds in the plan to achieve this goal. Nor is it necessary to have funds from multiple mutual fund companies.
3. Are your investment choices too complex?
In order to cover themselves and to offer a lot of choices, many plans are way to complex for most employees. Research on human behavior indicates that when presented with a large number of choices people will choose nothing or put everything in an investment that they understand.
The best 401k and 403b plans have very, very few choices. Reducing complexity through the reduction of the number of fund choices makes it easier for the employees to see the big picture and will increase the likelihood that they will invest in multiple asset classes.
The US Government defined contribution plan consists of only four (4)main investment options :US Stock Index Fund (Large/Mid/Small Domestic Stock), International Stock Index Fund (International Stock), Bond Index Fund (Bonds), Money Market (Cash). I think this plan is almost ideal. The only option I would add would be a Real Estate Index Fund.
Having a few investment options may upset the employees who like to “play the market” by trading in their retirement accounts frequently; however , this is not the purpose of the plan and reducing the number of choices will likely improve the investment choices of most employees.
4. What are the motivations and interests of the person who is advising you about your plan?
Many plan advisors are employees of an insurance company, stock brokerage, or mutual fund company. All of these people have a fundamental conflict of interest with you. They get compensated for selling you something so the advice that they provide you may not be objective. They may also neglect to explain all of the hidden costs involved with any investment recommendations they make. Many of the “free” services they provide come with a high long-term cost.
5. What type of fund is best for a retirement plan?
I almost always recommend that the plan choices be comprised of index funds. The major advantage of index funds is their low cost. The annual fee on an index fund may be over 1% less than a comparable non-index or actively managed fund. Since there is no difference in long-term performance between index and actively managed funds in almost all asset classes, the lower fees add up to higher returns in the long run.
6. How do you find people to help evaluate your current plan or set up a new one?
Hire an independent Fee-Only advisor to do the following:
- Evaluate your current plan (including all costs)
- And/or make investment recommendations for your current or new plan
- Write an investment policy statement for your plan
- Try and find an advisor who will work for an hourly or flat fee vs % of the assets managed.
- Provide employee education sessions to help them make good investment choices
Hire a plan administrator that: (this is the company that get the employee contributions and make sure they are invested as desired, they also work with you on compliance issues, and provide a website for the employees to see their balances and change their investment allocations. In bundled plans both the advisor and administrator role are handled by one company)
- Charges a flat or per-employee fee vs. an asset management fee
- Offers low cost index funds as investment options
- Your plan advisor may be able to recommend a plan administrator
How a bad Employer Retirement Plan Can Cost You — Big Time (Part 1)
Friday, March 16th, 2007No, this is not another Enron, WorldCom, or other corporate scandal but a perfectly legal way that many 401(k) and 403(b) plan advisors and administrators charge excessive fees that can cost the plan participants a big chunk of their retirement savings. The real shame is most employers and plan participants never realize what has happened or how much it has cost them.
In the beginning . . .
In 2003 the 403(b) plan at a non-profit organization I volunteered for was typical of high cost plans. It was invested in variable annuities sponsored by a large insurance company. Many of the employees suspected the plan might be costing them a lot of money but did not know how.
How High Are the Fees
They were right. According to Morningstar the average variable annuity has an annual fee of 2.08%. This fee does not include any one-time sales charges known as loads of up to 5.75% that many funds in charge, or additional annual fees of up to 1% or more charged by the plan advisor.
These fees significantly reduce the overall investment return to the plan participants. In the example above, if the underlying investments in the plan returned 9% and the total fees were 3.08% the participants would receive a return of 5.92%. In addition, the fees would not be disclosed on the statements provided to plan participants. This insidious practice is very common in employer sponsored retirement plans.
What does this mean to the average participant?
If a particiapant invested $10,000/year (adjusted for inflation) for 40 years with a 9% return (before fees), she would accumulate approximately $2,400,000 but pay fees of almost $875,000, assuming an annual annuity fee of 2.08% and an additional advisor fee of 1%.
Contrast this dismal example with a plan composed of low-cost index funds with an annual fee of 0.25% in which the plan advisor and plan administrator charge a flat fee which is not based on the assets in the plan. For an organization with 100 employees, this could be around $13,000/year. In this case, the employee would have almost $4,800,000 and paid total fees of only $120,000.
In the variable annuity plan the participant would only have accumulated half of the retirement assets that she would have in the low-cost index fund plan.
Click below to see a graph of estimated retirement savings
Retirement Savings Comparison
Next Blog — Part 2: How do “Bad” investment options end up your retirement plan?