Archive for the ‘Families’ Category

Unmarried Partners and Planning Software: Often a Bad Fit

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

If you are in a domestic partnership, civil union, or marriage that is not recognized at the Federal Level most of the software that financial planners use won’t work for you.

Here’s why:
Most software is keyed off the IRS tax filing status.  This filing status is used to generate future tax projections.  Let’s say you are in a newly minted Civil Union here in Illinois which is not recognized by the Federal Government.  The planner has two options.

Option 1:  Plan jointly but get the taxes wrong
In this scenario the planner enters in the information for both partners together.  This allows for sharing of household expenses, and joint purchases, or liabilities.  That’s great but in order to do that the software only allows the planner to check the “married” box, which means that all of the federal tax calculations will be incorrect leading to possible misleading projections.

Option 2: Get the taxes right but no joint planning
In this scenario the planner enters information for each partner separately.  This means that the Federal tax calculations will be correct, but the couple will have two separate plans, vs. a joint plan.

Luckily a few software programs, including the one I use, do allow for joint planning with a “single” federal tax status.   If you are part of a couple that is not considered married under Federal law make sure to ask your planner if their software can handle that.  You may be surprised by the answer.

Having children could be a million dollar decision.

Monday, June 21st, 2010

Having children could be the biggest financial decision people make, even bigger than a home purchase.  According to the USDA the cost of raising a child to age 17 is $222,360.  If you send your child to private school in Chicago that could add an additional $260,000 on top of that.  A top private collage?  Add another $240,000 and your up to $722,360.  If you tack on the costs of buying a larger car or a larger home, or if you hire a nanny for child care, your cost could easily top $1 million.

See the Chicago Tribune Article for more.

Long & Associates Clients Featured in the WSJ

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Recently two Long & Associates clients were featured in an ongoing series in the Wall Street Journal called “Savings Strategies”.  In December, 2008 Mike Casner and John Stryker were featured, and on April 7, Jody Feczko and Rob Lukens were featured.

I’d like to publicly thank these clients and the many others who have been willing to open up their financial lives so that others can learn from their experiences.

To Read about John and Mike:

To Read about Jody and Rob:

Higher Income makes it hard to Invest Enough for Retirement

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

It seems counterintuitive but having a higher income could make it harder for you to save enough to retire. Let’s look at two couples.

Couple 1:

Age: 45

Retirement Age: 65

Income: $400,000/year

Savings To Date: $500,000

Retirement Income Goal: $300,000/year (today’s dollars)

Less: Estimated Social Security $50,000/year*

Amount Needed from Investments: $250,000/year (today’s dollars)

Investment Income Needed 1st Year of Retirement: $547,866**

Annual Investment Needed***: $177,000

% of income to invest to meet Retirement Goal: 44%

Couple 2:

Age: 45

Retirement Age: 65

Income: $80,000/year

Savings To Date: $100,000

Retirement Income Goal: $64,000/year (today’s dollars)

Less: Estimated Social Security $40,000/year*

Amount Needed from Investments: $24,000/year (today’s dollars)

Investment Income Needed 1st Year of Retirement: $52,587**

Annual Investment Needed***: $13,000

% of income to invest to meet Retirement Goal: 16%

*Social Security could be reduced for higher income taxpayers in the future

** Assumes Inflation of 4%/year and Investment Return of 8% per year

***Increased by inflation rate each year.

The high income Couple needs to save 44% of their income vs. 16% for the moderate-income couple. Why? For the moderate-income couple Social Security will pay a much greater percentage of their retirement income. The Social Security tax is almost like forced retirement savings. The higher income couple is on their own to invest for retirement.

The message: If you have an income in this range or higher, it is even more important to invest a substantial portion of your income for retirement and not to let the fact that you can “afford” things now lead you to establish a lifestyle that will be unsustainable in retirement.

Avoiding the New Parent Financial Trap

Friday, April 13th, 2007

I work with many couples who are expecting their first child.  Many of them are not prepared for the financial implications of having a child and find themselves going from a free spending lifestyle to one where they are financially strapped with unplanned for expenses.

Here three big expenses that many new parents do not plan for:

  • Child Care: Full time child care can cost $15,000-$25,000 per year.

  • College Savings — If you want to pay for your child to go to the University of Illinois main campus (approx $19,000/year increasing by 6% per year) you would need to start saving $500/month beginning the month the child is born.  For Northwestern (approx $47,000/year increasing by 6% per year) you would need to start saving about $1200/month beginning the month the child is born.

  • Additional Medical Expenses — Birth and first year medical expenses can easily reach the out of pocket limit of many employer provided plans.  That limit could is often $2500 to $5000.

How can you avoid the new parent trap?

  • Do a financial test drive. If you are thinking you may have children change your spending habits to simulate having these expenses already. For example, have the estimated amounts for child care, college savings, and medical expenses automatically transferred to your savings account each month.  If you can’t live on the amount you have left over, you should rethink your spending priorities before you have children.

  • Don’t increase your fixed expenses. If you are living below your means now, this is not the time to buy a larger house, or a new car unless you know you can fit them if your budget and pay for all of the expenses for a new child.  Many parents to be set themselves up with a high fixed expense lifestyle.  When they have children they often end up selling their house or car to afford child care.

  • Have a discussion about your priorities. I find many couples have never discussed their life goals in a meaningful way until they are in my office.  This inevitably leads to disagreements about how to use their financial resources.  Parents to be should sit down and prioritize what are the most important things to each of them.  You should then quantify each goal in terms of the time required, the time frame to achieve it, and the financial resources required. Your financial planner can help with this part.

  • Own your decisions. Once you have quantified and prioritized your goals, you then can make decisions about how to use your financial resources. Whatever, decisions you make, OWN THEM. My goal is to never hear a client say “we have to sell the car, house, give up vacation.” This implies that an outside force is controlling them.  Much better to say “we decided that something else is more important to us.”  Those who take the latter attitude will be more successful in achieving their most important life goals and set a great example for their children.

Please Read if you have Young Children in Car Seats

Friday, January 5th, 2007

I’m sure many you have seen the newsreports about the failure of many child safety seats to protect children in simulated crashes. Consumer Reports Magazine recently tested 12 child seats. Of the tested seats 10 failed! Here is a link to results.

Yes, yes I know this post is not investment related, but I believe in a holistic approach to financial planning that goes beyond just investment advice.